The Anatomy of Antiliberalism读书介绍
类别 | 页数 | 译者 | 网友评分 | 年代 | 出版社 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
书籍 | 352 页 | 2020 | Harvard University Press |
定价 | 出版日期 | 最近访问 | 访问指数 |
---|---|---|---|
$47.50 | 2020-02-20 … | 2020-05-27 … | 27 |
Liberal: spoken in a certain tone, heard more and more often lately, it summons up permissiveness, materialism, rootlessness, skepticism, relativism run rampant. How has liberalism, the grand democratic ideal, come to be a dirty word? This hook shows us what antiliberalism means in the modern world--where it comes from, whom it serves, and why it speaks with such a forceful, if everchanging, voice.
In the past, in a battle pitting one offspring of eighteenth-century rationalism against another, Marxism has been liberalism's best known and most vociferous opponent. But with the fall of communism, the voices of ethnic particularism, communitarianism, and religious fundamentalism--a tradition Holmes traces to Joseph de Maistre--have become louder in rejection of the Enlightenment, failing to distinguish between the descendants of Karl Marx and Adam Smith. Stephen Holmes uses the tools of the political theorist and the intellectual historian to expose the philosophical underpinnings of antiliberalism in its nonmarxist guise. Examining the works of some of liberalism's severest critics--including Maistre, Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and Alasdair Maclntyre--Holmes provides, in effect, a reader's guide to antiliberal culture, in all its colorful and often seductive, however nefarious, variety. As much a mindset as a theory, as much a sensibility as an argument, antiliberalism appears here in its diverse efforts to pit "spiritual truths" and "communal bonds" against a perceived cultural decay and moral disintegration. This corrosion of the social fabric--rather than the separation of powers, competitive elections, a free press, religious tolerance, public budgets, and judicial controls on the police--is what the antiliberal forces see as the core of liberal politics. Against this picture, Holmes outlines the classical liberal arguments most often misrepresented by the enemies of liberalism and most essential to the future of democracy.
Constructive as well as critical, this book helps us see what liberalism is and must be, and why it must and always will engender deep misgivings along with passionate commitment.
作者简介Stephen Holmes:Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law.
Courses:
Federalist Papers
Legal Change After Communism (year)
Law and Security Colloquium
Education:
B.A., Denison University, 1969
M.A., Yale University, 1974
M. Phil., Yale University, 1975
Ph.D., Yale University, 1976
Representative Publications
"Plato’s Dogs: Reflections on the University After 9/11," in To Restore American ...
剧情呢,免费看分享剧情、挑选影视作品、精选好书简介分享。